Recent hail storm events have caused significant property damage to homeowners in Colorado, and many are having difficulty getting property insurance carriers to pay for roof and siding damage or losses to their homes or common interest communities.
Colorado law provides homeowners with significant rights and remedies when insurance carriers unreasonably deny or delaying paying homeowners for losses. In Colorado, an insurance carrier that unreasonably delays or denies a claim can be held liable for twice the amount of the covered benefit and payment of a homeowner’s attorney fees. Additionally, Colorado recognizes claims against insurance carriers for damages due to an insurance carrier’s breach of contract, bad faith conduct and violations of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.
Should you have any questions about your policy or the manner in which your insurance carrier is handling your claim, contact the Milo D. Miller Law Group, P.C. at 720-306-7733
Local municipalities often adopt zoning regulations that appear at first glance to preclude certain commercial activity in an effort to preserve characteristics deemed desirable by the municipality. For example, a municipality in Minnesota adopted an ordinance that prohibited local farmers from selling agricultural products not grown in the town of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Similarly, certain local governing bodies in Colorado have adopted regulations that preclude the sale of agricultural products that do not originate from the owner’s land. The municipalities argue that the regulations are intended to promote the rural character of community where the sale is taking place.
In Minnesota, the Town of Lake Elmo adopted regulations that precluded local family farmers from selling Christmas trees because the Christmas trees were imported from out of state. The family brought an action in the United State District Court for the District of Minnesota to prevent Lake Elmo from enforcing the regulation. As the plaintiff, the family argued that the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution prevented enforcement of the ordinance because the ordinance had the impact of discriminating against interstate commerce and created an excessive burden on commerce. The Court agreed, granting an injunction preventing enforcement of the ordinance.
Local Colorado governing bodies have adopted similar regulations to the ordinance adopted by Lake Elmo. The regulations can carry fines and criminal penalties associated with alleged violations; however, such regulations may not be enforceable based on the United States Constitution and other laws.
For more information contact the law firm of Milo D. Miller Law Group, P.C. at 720-306-7733.